Tuesday, July 15, 2025

Joe Sheehan Newsletter, July 15, 2025 -- "Fun With Numbers: The All-Star Game is Too Late"

 This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $59.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card.

--
 
Although I’m a stathead at heart, I’ve become a bit more willing, as I get older, to give credence to my subjective baseball opinions. Baserunning is generally worse than it used to be. Umpires call too many checked swings, swings. The canned noise at ballparks has crossed the line from “tolerable” to “punishing.”

Watching the last week of ball before the break, the game seemed dead. I don’t just mean the baseballs themselves, though that was part of it. I mean the players, the level of energy in the games, their intensity. Again, this is entirely subjective. I can’t back this up. I just know that watching players gut through a July heat wave made me think of late-September baseball, when so many guys just want to go home.

Maybe they did.

This year’s All-Star break hits as 59.5% of the schedule has been played, the third-latest the All-Star Game has been played by this measure. Last season’s was the second-latest.

The Midsummer Classic (highest % of schedule played by ASG, full seasons)

1973    60.2%
2024    59.7%
2025    59.5%
2018    59.4%
1974    59.1%

(For today’s purposes, we’re excluding years with no All-Star Game (1945, 2020) and years with a curtailed first half (1981, 1995). We’re also only counting the first Game in years when two were played.)


Before we dig any deeper, let’s talk about how the All-Star Game is scheduled. The first one was held back on July 6, 1933, planned as a one-off benefit during the Great Depression. Since then, the Game has always been scheduled in July, and most often during the second week of July. 

All Four (distribution of All-Star Games by July week)

First     9
Second   64
Third    13
Fourth    4

The early and late windows have fallen out of favor. No All-Star Game has been scheduled outside of the second or third weeks of July since 1983, when the league held the game on July 6 to mark its 50th anniversary. (Also a big day in Joe Sheehan lore, ask me at the next in-person event.) The late window was a short-lived thing from 1969 through 1974; there has never been a late-scheduled game since. In modern baseball, the All-Star Game always occurs on the second or third Tuesday of July. It has been on the third Tuesday in four of the last seven years, though the 2020 game was scheduled for July 14, the second Tuesday.

So what explains this trend? The Y-axis here is the percentage of games played by the All-Star break. The X-axis is just time.

First off is Opening Day, a topic ESPN’s David Schoenfield looked at way back in 2015:

"For example, here are the starting dates for various years: 

1910: April 14 
1920: April 14 
1930: April 14 
1940: April 16 
1950: April 18 
1960: April 12 (although the American League didn't start until April 18)"

In 1961 and 1962, each league expanded by two teams and added eight games to the schedule. In 1969, a round of playoffs was added, and in 1994, another one. In 2012, a play-in game was added, and that expanded in 2022 to a best-of-three, with two more teams making the playoffs. These changes have made a mid-April start to the season a distant memory. Setting aside late starts due to pandemics and lockouts, the season has started in March five straight years now, and will probably start in March until the regular season is shortened sometime in the 2030s.

The season starts 17 days earlier than it did when the All-Star Game was invented. It starts one to two weeks earlier than it did in the 1980s. You can go back and look at my awesome chart if you want, but here’s an example of just how stable the sport’s schedule was for a long time,

Like A Rock (percentage of season played by the ASG)

1984   52.4%
1985   53.3%
1986   53.8%
1987   53.8%
1988   53.4%
1989   53.1%
1990   50.6%
1991   49.8%
1992   53.9%
1993   53.9%


I stopped there, but the numbers continue like that well into the 21st century. The All-Star Game happened just past the midpoint of the season, around the 14-week mark, like clockwork. Your baseball-tuned body just knew when it was happening. The All-Star Game hasn’t happened before the 55% mark since 2017, or 2012 if you round a lot of 54.8s up.

One of the points I have hammered over the years is that sometime around 1990, the people who run baseball stopped believing in the game. Maybe you can tie it to the disastrous CBS contract that ended the Game of the Week, or a changeover in ownership groups that brought in people less invested in the game as an institution, or the growth of the NBA as a second challenger alongside the NFL. Whatever the reason, the people who run baseball have spent the last 35 years chasing rather than leading. Playoff expansion, the conversion of leagues to conferences, the constant grab for every nickel.

In all that, MLB broke the season’s rhythm. The All-Star Game, still slotted in the calendar where it has been for most of its history, now arrives later in the season. The players have to play an extra week or two to get to the break, and it shows. We’ll exit the break with just two weeks to the trade deadline, barely 40% of the schedule left to play. It’s still the Midsummer Classic, but it feels more like the 60% Exhibition.

The fix here is simple: Move the game up. The All-Star Game is scheduled to be played at the same date it was when the season began in mid-April. Its scheduling should move in the same direction that Opening Day has moved. There’s plenty of room to push it forward a week and still have it in July. It even sets up the 100th anniversary Game, which can be played on Wednesday, July 6, 2033. 

The “first half” is too long, the “second half” too short. MLB can make one small change to its calendar and, in doing so, make the season flow much better.


Monday, July 14, 2025

Newsletter Excerpt, July 14, 2024 -- "Thinking Inside the Box, Biggest Ever Edition"

 

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $59.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card.

--
 
Pirates 2, Twins 1

                  AB  R  H  BI
Pham LF            4  1  1   1 HR 


Tommy Pham’s second-inning home run was the Pirates’ 66th of the year, fewest of any team in the league, though not any kind of first-half record. Their slugging percentage of .339, though, that’s brutal. The Pirates are just the seventh team this century to reach the All-Star break slugging under .340, and they have a chance to be the lowest-power team of the century. The 2013 Marlins slugged .335, and the 2010 Mariners slugged .339; those are the only two teams since 2001 that failed to reach .340 in a full season.

I have been a defender of Ben Cherington in the past, and I still regard him as a strong baseball mind. Looking at these Pirates, though, I really have no idea what they are doing. Eight Pirates have at least 200 PA. One is 38, one is 37, one is 33. Throw in Bryan Reynolds and Isiah Kiner-Falefa, and most days they play more guys in their 30s than in their 20s. What are you building with that? What does giving Adam Frazier 262 plate appearances do for you now or in the future? Andrew McCutchen is one of the great players in franchise history; he’s 38, a tick above replacement, and fourth on the team in PAs. What are we even doing here?

I posted my annual opinion about the draft last night. I think about Paul Skenes, who never had any choice but to be a Pirate. We let these teams dictate the futures of hundreds of young men, denying them any agency in what organization they wish to join. Would you let your son or daughter join the 30th-best organization in their field, or would you encourage them to choose one with a greater chance of success? Skenes deserved to pick his own future, and what the Pirates have done since selecting him without his input to join their diseased organization is one of the best arguments against sports drafts that I can muster.

I can make a similar argument about Royce Lewis, assigned to the Twins just after his 18th birthday and unlikely to be able to select his own employer until he’s 30. Lewis is a less-sympathetic character, though, part of the reason the Twins are such a disappointment this year. An offense I thought would rank seventh in baseball is instead 17th, providing most of the gap between their expected performance and their actual one. I still think they have the talent to make a second-half run. They play their last seven games against the Tigers over a two-week span in August, and that’s their chance to make a stand. 
 
 

Sunday, July 13, 2025

Newsletter Excerpt, July 13, 2025 -- "Red (Hot) Sox"

 

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $59.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card.

--
 
Cora is further twisting himself into knots by having Rafaela move back to second base, where he played last night. Rafaela is a top-three defensive outfielder in all of baseball...and a bad infielder. If he is in the starting lineup and not playing center field, it’s a massive error that makes the Sox less likely to win that day’s game. Rafaela’s breakout has come while playing center every day, as opposed to the hybrid CF/SS role he played a year ago. Messing with him now is just asking to reverse all the progress he has made.  
 
 

Friday, July 11, 2025

Newsletter Excerpt, July 11, 2025 -- "Dodgers Good, Dodgers Bad"

 

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $59.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card.

--
 
With the Dodgers, you always have to circle back to the first principle: The regular season is a 162-game extension of spring training for them. They’re not trying to win 117 games, despite my fervent hopes, just winning enough to make the playoffs, maybe get that bye. Their goal isn’t to put their best team on the field on March 27 or May 27 or even September 27, but rather to make sure that come October 4 at Dodger Stadium, they have their top 26 guys healthy, rested, and ready to win 11 games. It’s a cynical approach to a baseball season, but after years of dominating for six months and then being told they were failures because they lost three of four or four of six at the wrong time, the Dodgers finally leaned into the ethics of modern baseball. They won a title last year for their trouble and remain the favorites to do so again. 
 
 

Wednesday, July 9, 2025

Newsletter Excerpt, July 9, 2025 -- "Bailey's on the move..."

 

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $59.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card.

--
 
Bailey came into last night’s game hitting .188/.255/.275, with a 51 wRC+ that was better than just three players with at least 200 PA. He’d recently spent a stint on the IL with a strained neck, and since returning had nearly twice as many strikeouts as hits in 15 games. His well-regarded framing skills were keeping his WAR above water, though even those weren’t enough to stave off some calls for him to ride the pine. One memorable walkoff doesn’t change the math; Bailey is still one of the worst hitters in baseball this year on a team that doesn’t have enough good ones to carry a total zero, no matter how well he turns balls into strikes.

 
 
 

Monday, July 7, 2025

Newsletter Excerpt, July 7, 2025 -- "Long National Nightmare Ends. Maybe."

 

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $59.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card.

--
 
Long National Nightmare Ends. Maybe.

Last night, Nationals Managing Principal Owner -- I don’t make the titles, folks -- Mark Lerner fired GM Mike Rizzo and manager Dave Martinez for their failure to force Lerner to spend money on good baseball players.

Rizzo, who turned Juan Soto into a championship-caliber core making no money, was hamstrung by two generations of Lerners over the last six seasons, as ownership navigated the MASN debacle and readied itself for sale. The Nats’ cash payroll is lower this year than it was in 2014. Rizzo built the 2019 World Series champs and had a good start on building the 2029 ones. He simply wasn’t allowed to do the rest of the job. 

Martinez did the best with what he had in recent seasons, and certainly deserves some credit for the development of the young players Rizzo acquired as he tore down those ’19 champions. I saw the Nats close up a week ago in a game they lost as a succession of replacement-level pitchers came out of the bullpen in Anaheim to kill off a potential win. The first one I’d seen before, the second’s name was vaguely familiar, the third was almost certainly an AI hallucination. Nats relievers have the highest ERA and highest FIP in baseball, and only the Angels have a worse bullpen fWAR. Managers in the modern game have their greatest impact by selecting and deploying relief pitchers, so Martinez may deserve a little blame, but Tony La Russa at his peak couldn’t make a good bullpen from the guys the Nats have in hand.

The Nationals are where they are because they have bad ownership. As I have said many, many times, the Nationals lost more to the pandemic than any other team did, unable to capitalize at the gate on their championship season. The Lerners, first father then son, exacerbated that problem, forcing a rebuild, slashing payroll, and failing to let Rizzo put better-paid pieces around a very impressive group of young, inexpensive players. Firing the management team just before the draft and trade deadline is the kind of impetuous move that underlines that Mark Lerner is in over his head.

The Nationals didn’t solve any problems by firing Rizzo and Martinez. Until there is new ownership, not much is going to change in D.C.