Wednesday, July 15, 2026

Joe Sheehan Newsletter, July 15, 2026 -- "MLB + IOC = NFW"

 

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

Arrive here from BlueSky today? Take 20% off a one-year subscription.

--

The Joe Sheehan Newsletter: MLB + IOC = NFW
Vol. 18, No. 60
July 15, 2026

That wasn’t much of an All-Star Game. Despite six or seven of the best pitchers in baseball sitting this one out, there were just four runs, ten hits, one extra-base hit, and a 39% strikeout rate. The middle innings were a slog, quick frames with little action interspersed with ceremonies and concerts and various delays. This was probably a 2:10 game inflated to 2:45 and lasting well past 11 p.m. in the East.

This is, last year notwithstanding, just the way modern All-Star Games will be played. Well-rested pitchers asked to throw an inning at a time can dominate even the best hitters in the sport. Half the game will be played by a fairly anonymous group. No single player participates in enough of the game to break out, and even the best stories, like Miguel Vargas’s home run, are unlikely to cross over into the mainstream.

All-Star Games are anachronisms, and the argument that MLB’s is closer to a real game than the ones in other leagues is weak sauce. They had Kyle Schwarber trying to have a conversation with Joe Davis while facing 95-mph fastballs in the third; no one is taking this seriously. That the All-Star Game is a marketing event that doesn’t have enough to market is one reason the Home Run Derby has supplanted the Game as the marquee event of the extended baseball weekend. At least you get good visuals.

Speaking of baseball-flavored substances, Evan Drellich reported that MLB, as part of its effort to have major leaguers participate in the 2028 Olympics, proposed extended suspensions for players picked to play in the Olympics who do not participate. MLB is, not without reason, worried that many of the game’s stars won't play after the IOC reinstated baseball for these Olympics, to be held in the sport’s home country. MLB’s proposal is that players who decline to participate in the one-week Olympic tournament, to take place from July 13-19, would be restricted from MLB play for 25 days, from July 10 through August 3.

Like many MLB proposals in these CBA negotiations, it’s a non-starter, and I don’t want to spend too much time on it. The idea that playing or not playing in the Olympics would be allowed to have such a significant effect on real MLB playoff races is too silly to engage with. MLB continues to treat the players as if it’s 1948 and they have a house union and no rights; this is just part and parcel. 

No, what I want to ask is why MLB is twisting itself into knots to placate the IOC. The IOC has never respected or cared for baseball. Prior to 1992, baseball had never been played at more than two consecutive Olympics. That year was also just the third time, after 1924 and 1968, that baseball was more than a demonstration or exhibition sport at the Games. After 2008, the IOC dumped baseball for three of the next four Olympics.

It was during that period that MLB created, grew, and sustained through a global pandemic the World Baseball Classic. I may not be the world’s biggest WBC honk, but after six events in 20 years, the WBC has become the premier world championship of baseball. The event is highly competitive; four nations have won the six titles, and seven have participated in the championship round. It has lore. It has heroes. It has rivalries. It has controversies. In 20 years the WBC has created more great baseball moments than exist in the entire history of Olympic baseball.

MLB doesn’t need the Olympics. The baseball tournament will be a pale imitation of the WBC, six teams playing a total of 12 games over seven days, with the first six merely a seeding round -- no one will be eliminated at that stage. The IOC has set it up this way to minimize disruption to the MLB calendar, but there’s really no way to avoid that. Stapling this to the All-Star break means MLB will have to take an 11-day break, maybe 14 days, at a time when MLB teams draw best and have the sports stage to themselves.

The ballplayers competing at the Olympics will take pride in doing so, but the pinnacle for baseball players is the World Series, and second to that is a WBC title. It’s hard to build two-minute soft-focus featurettes around guys making $26 million a year who are clearly on a break from their real jobs. 

Mostly, though, the Olympic baseball tournament will, at absolute best, be the #5 sport at the Games for NBC. The network won’t be promoting or programming baseball ahead of the core four of gymnastics, swimming, basketball, or track. I am not convinced baseball will be a priority ahead of beach volleyball. One benefit of a Los Angeles Games is that NBC can actually show the most popular competitions live to the U.S. audience, and baseball is going to have a hard time breaking through the most established Olympic sports that have wider appeal and better stories. 

There’s no future here, either. The Olympic Games being held close to the All-Star break in the United States are the best-case scenario and they still require giving up a week to ten days of summer attendance. The 2032 Olympics will be held from July 23 to August 8 in Australia, and there’s no way for MLB players to participate in that tournament without blowing up the summer. The 2036 Olympics don’t have a date or location yet, but they will almost certainly not be played in the Eastern Hemisphere. The 2028 Olympics are going to be a one-off for MLB players and, as history shows, the IOC doesn’t need an excuse to bury America’s pastime. 

The 2028 Olympic baseball tournament, a whopping 12 games in seven days, won’t have the footprint to make a meaningful impact on baseball’s popularity no matter who plays. It will be a secondary sport at best for the main broadcaster. Hell, it will be the #2 American team sport behind hoops. It can’t be the pinnacle achievement for the players, who have both a professional goal and an international goal ahead of an Olympic title. Even if I’m wrong about all that and it’s a wild success, there’s no practical way to repeat it in 2032 without wrecking the MLB season. 

MLB has to back away from the 2028 Olympics. Let career minor leaguers play, let some prospects play, hell, let lower-tier major leaguers play if their teams don’t mind. Do not alter the schedule at all, do not force players to play. MLB has the World Baseball Classic. The WBC, whatever its challenges, is a far better promotional vehicle for baseball than Olympic baseball has ever been or will ever be. MLB doesn’t need the Olympics, and it definitely doesn’t need to interrupt a championship season for the Olympics.
 
-
 
Arrive here from BlueSky today? Take 20% off a one-year subscription.
 

Newsletter Excerpt, July 15, 2026 -- "Thinking Inside the Box"

 

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $79.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.)

--
 
Diamondbacks 5, Dodgers 3

                 AB  R  H  BI
Betts SS          4  0  0   0

Tucker RF         4  0  0   0

The Dodgers lost Sunday, but they’re still 61-36 while getting almost nothing from $100 million worth of hitters. It’s probably fair to think this is Mookie Betts’s level now, in his second straight year of being more or less a league average hitter. He’s also lost just about all his applied speed, with two triples, nine steals, and 25 GIDPs since the start of 2025. Betts’s glove at shortstop is holding up the entire profile, which would have sounded crazy two years ago.

Kyle Tucker is the NL’s version of Cal Raleigh, just unable to productively hit the baseball. Tucker does have a league-average batting line, a 12.5% walk rate, and a 6-for-6 mark stealing bases. He wasn’t signed, though, to slug .375 with seven homers. It actually looks worse than that, Tucker working deep counts before limply rolling over to second base or popping up. I can kind of understand Raleigh’s collapse; Tucker just lost his ability to drive the ball over one winter.

Will Smith is having the worst year of his career. Tyler Glasnow, Blake Snell, and Edwin Diaz have combined for fewer than 50 innings. The Dodgers have the best record in baseball. I think Dave Roberts is the NL Manager of the Year.
 
-
 
You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $79.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.) 
 

Monday, July 13, 2026

Newsletter Excerpt, July 13, 2026 -- "Red (Hot) Sox"

 

 

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $79.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.)

--
 
Boy, can they catch the ball, though. Statcast has the defense second in baseball with 20 runs prevented. Total Zone and Defensive Runs Saved, both presented by Baseball Reference, say they have the #2 defense in the game. Baseball Prospectus, which runs at all these questions a bit differently, slots them fifth. Whatever system you use, you quickly reach two conclusions: The Red Sox defense is among the best in baseball, and the Red Sox defense is carrying the team right now.

Ceddanne Rafaela is one of the five best defenders in the game, and he’s joined in the outfield by Jarren Duran and Wilyer Abreu in being at least +6 by Statcast measures. The Sox outfield has been +21 so far; the highest mark ever recorded by Statcast is +34, by the 2021 Rays. (Last year’s Sox were +30.)
 
-
 
You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $79.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.) 
 

Wednesday, July 8, 2026

Newsletter Excerpt, July 8, 2026 -- "Paul Skenes"

 

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $79.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.)

--
 
Let’s level-set again. As play begins today, Skenes is eighth in MLB in FIP, tenth in xFIP, second in Statcast expected ERA, eighth in pitcher WAR at FanGraphs. There’s a pretty good argument that we should all shut up and leave him alone. If we are going to nitpick, though, it’s at the edges of his repertoire, where some pitches are both showing up poorly in stuff models and producing poor results. Skenes might be better off eliminating at least one of these deliveries -- I would say the change but you can argue for the sinker -- and focusing on the pitches he throws the best.
 
-
 
You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $79.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.) 
 

Monday, July 6, 2026

Newsletter Excerpt, July 6, 2026 -- "Eury Perez"

 

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $79.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.)

--
 
The people mad about McCullough’s decision are wrong about the specifics. They do, however, point us to a very real change in how we appreciate baseball now. Baseball, all sports really, are now solely about reaching the playoffs and winning rings. All actions, all decisions, are subsumed to those goals. If letting Eury Perez go 120 pitches in a perfect game makes the Marlins 0.3% less likely to make the playoffs, it’s a bad decision. 

That wasn’t always the case. Until the playoff expansion of the 1990s, success for a baseball team was defined in any number of ways. Just four teams made the playoffs in my youth, and while you always wanted your team to be one of them, and to go on to win the World Series, there were other markers of success. Did you contend? If you weren’t expected to be good, were you surprisingly so? Did you bring along exciting rookies, or have a player chase a batting title? Did you provide that one particular memory to build the season around?


Saturday, July 4, 2026

Newsletter Excerpt, July 4, 2026 -- "Thinking Inside the Box"

 

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $79.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.)

--
 
Guardians 4, White Sox 3 (10 inn.)

RISP: 5-8

The Guardians, like their Ohio counterparts, also can’t hit. Last night. they had six singles and five walks, but they had great “cluster luck,” as the great Joe Peta would put it. Five of those six singles came with runners in scoring position, and the last two, off Sean Newcomb in the tenth, advanced and then scored the stupid runner to give the Guardians a second straight one-run with over the White Sox, and sole possession of first place in the AL Central.

Lest we start turning the Guardians into the AL Brewers...well, the Brewers used to be the AL Brewers...note that even after last night, they’re hitting .229/.323/.363 with runners in scoring position. The average and slugging are both 28th in MLB with RISP. They can’t hit, and they don’t have any special ability to hit in leverage. They just happened to stack their hits perfectly last night. The standings don’t care how you got there. 


Friday, July 3, 2026

Newsletter Excerpt, July 3, 2026 -- "Central Time"

 

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $79.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.)

--
 
I put the Cards under the microscope May 16 and concluded:

So separate the two ideas. The Cardinals are 26-18, but it’s a bit of a mirage built on close games falling their way and the healthiest roster in the league. They’ve used just 14 position players, six starting pitchers (with just one off-rotation start) and 11 relief pitchers (seven accounting for 89% of the relief innings), and the odds say they’ll have to reach into their depth soon enough.

That hasn’t happened. They made some elective changes, with Nootbaar returning and Scott and Gorman losing their jobs, but the position player group has remained healthy. They’ve had one additional off-rotation start, making a total of two. The top seven relievers still account for 84% of the team’s relief innings. I would say that most of the Cardinals’ success, the biggest reason they’re in contention, is that their depth has not been tested at all. Almost any MLB team that only has to use its top 28 or so players is going to have a puncher’s chance to make the playoffs. If that somehow holds up for three more months, the Cardinals can stay in the wild-card mix.  
 
--
 
You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $79.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.) 

Wednesday, July 1, 2026

Newsletter Excerpt, July 1, 2026 -- "Mailbag"

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $79.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.)

--
 
The Unhappy Fans

Reds fan here. Local media is driving me crazy. Terry Francona has transformed the team's philosophy into what they call "The Art of Hitting," essentially eschewing pulling the ball into the air, instead encouraging players to hit the ball the other way. Sacrifice bunting in now in vogue.They refer to it as situational hitting. Playing to the scoreboard. The Reds seem to be drifting away from analytics for what they see as a more holistic approach. This seems to be a function of ownership's refusal to spend big money. What say you? 

-- Richard F.

I actually had not heard tell of this. I went and looked, and the Reds are middle of the pack in sac bunts with a bottom-five OBP, indicative of a high rate of use. They’re 23rd in pulled fly balls, eighth in hitting to the opposite field. Last year, they were 12th in pulled fly balls and 26th in oppo rate. So the numbers back up your story that this is an intentional thing.

Here’s the rest of the story: The Reds are 24th in wOBA, 29th in wRC+, 23rd in runs scored, all worse than they were a year ago. By Clay Davenport’s estimates, they’re scoring eight fewer runs than you’d expect from their run elements, so it’s not like these approaches are finding more runs than they might otherwise score.

I can understand why this is driving you crazy. The Reds are preaching a style of play that will produce fewer runs. There’s real passion in many quarters of baseball to disprove what is true: That hitting the ball hard and up is the way to win, that pulled fly balls are the most productive batted balls, that you can’t string singles and bunts together to win a championship. The Reds, and disappointingly Francona, seem more concerned about making a point than winning games. This could well explain why so many of their young hitters have gone backward in recent years.

I don’t know what more you can do than point to the results. It’s not working.

--J.
  

Tuesday, June 30, 2026

Newsletter Excerpt, June 30, 2026 -- "Texas Five-Step"

 

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $79.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.)

--
 
Skip Schumaker has settled on Latz as the closer but not a specialist, with Latz entering in the eighth inning six times in 11 June appearances, and racking up six saves of four outs or more. It’s the kind of usage guys like me have been begging for for years. Latz, developed as a starter, actually opened his year starting against the Phillies and going four no-hit innings. He is a three-pitch pitcher who also mixes in a curve on occasion, and perhaps most important to his current usage, has allowed just a .212/.302/.359 slash line to right-handed batted in his five-year career. This year, he’s posted a 30/6 K/UIBB against right-handed batters, with a .098/.167/.195 line. The .118 BABIP allowed is unquestionably doing a lot of work there, but the 33% strikeout rate and 5:1 K/BB show that it’s not just luck.

Latz may have the endurance to be a unicorn who can go multiple innings and also work back-to-back games. As it stands, with nine multi-inning saves, Latz is in position to be the first pitcher since 2019 with at least ten of those (Josh Hader, 15), and has a shot at the 21st-century mark of 16, set by John Smoltz in 2004. Dan Quisenberry had the most with 35 in 1983, and no one has been over 20 since 1990. 
 
-  

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $79.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.)

 

Monday, June 29, 2026

Newsletter Excerpt, June 29, 2026 -- "Swee...wait!...OK, Sweep."

 

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $79.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.)

--
 
We are, as we have so often been this year, trapped between the standings and the metrics. One says the Sox are 36-46, in last place, miles out of first and ninth in a 12-team wild-card stack. The other says they’ve outscored their opponents and are a top-five team in the AL with a starting rotation to match. As the Sox head into a very soft portion of the schedule -- home to the Nationals and then a road trip to play the Angels, White Sox, and Mets -- they have a chance to further define themselves as a playoff contender built around starting pitching.
 
-
 
You can subscribe to the newsletter for one year for $79.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.) 
 
 

Friday, June 26, 2026

Joe Sheehan Newsletter, June 26, 2026 -- "Carlos Mendoza Fired"

 

This is a preview of the Joe Sheehan Baseball Newsletter, an e-mail newsletter about all things baseball, featuring analysis and opinion about the game on and off the field from the perspective of the informed outsider.

You can subscribe to the newsletter this week only for one year for 20% off, just $63.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.)

--

The Joe Sheehan Newsletter: Carlos Mendoza Fired
Vol. 18, No. 51
June 26, 2026

Friday morning, the Mets announced that Carlos Mendoza is no longer their manager. They didn’t use the word “fired,” which is just a fig leaf. Mendoza, in his third season at the helm, had overseen a decline from 89 to 83 to this year’s 68-win pace. The Mets are in last place, and while he’s not the primary reason for that, he’s not someone who was part of the solution, either.

I’ve been a Mendoza critic for a while, mostly owing to his incredibly slow hook with starters. As far back as the 2024 playoffs...


It was all the decisions around that one that got Mendoza in trouble. We’ve been talking about his slow hook all year. Perhaps letting Luis Severino start the sixth with a three-run lead, with Severino on five shutout innings with no walks and a low pitch count, wasn’t a mistake. Severino allowed a .272/.364/.479 line to batters facing him a third time this season, but the Phillies’ #9 man was starting the sixth, so go batter by batter. You have to have someone ready, though, and when Severino allows a two-out single to Trea Turner, it’s time to be aggressive. If Danny Young isn’t on the roster to face Bryce Harper with two outs, why is he on the roster? You’re up a set and a break on the Phillies with a chance to go home up 2-0 in the series. It’s not the time to sit back and watch, it’s the time to be aggressive.

Once Harper homers off Severino, you have to pull him. Mendoza, though, let Severino pitch to Nick Castellanos. Castellanos obliterated a sweeper to tie the game at three. 

The general third-time penalty (TTP) isn’t some esoteric bit of data yanked from a darkened cave two weeks ago, nor are Severino’s struggles when left in a game to face hitters a third time. You’re carrying 13 pitchers, there’s an off day tomorrow. If you take nothing else from this year’s postseason coverage, take this: There is no such thing as “cruising.” A pitcher’s performance to date in a game is in no way predictive of what his performance will be for the rest of the game. Luis Severino had no business pitching to Bryce Harper, and that’s the biggest managerial error of the playoffs to date. The series is now tied.

I would go back to the theme of Mendoza’s handling of his pitchers again and again during the Mets’ October run. 

In the summer of 2025, it came up again.


I’ve been complaining about Carlos Mendoza’s slow hook on Slack for more than a year now. Had Patrick Bailey not done what he did Tuesday night, Wednesday’s Newsletter may have been entirely about the topic. With Mendoza, though, you’re never far from the next chance to write about it.

Sean Manaea made his debut yesterday in relief of Clay Holmes, clearly a planned tandem start that was perhaps thrown off kilter by Holmes getting through five innings on just 81 pitches. Manaea tacked on three shutout frames, laboring a bit in the eighth before escaping unharmed. I was watching that eighth, and Manaea looked tired to me, It was his first outing back, a hot day in Kansas City, maybe the adrenaline was wearing off. Manaea couldn’t finish off Vinnie Pasquantino, who singled on the tenth pitch of his at-bat. Mendoza, though, left Manaea in to pitch to Maikel Garcia, who popped out on the first pitch. 

When the Mets tied the game off Carlos Estevez, though, Mendoza sent Manaea back to pitch the ninth. I understand that Manaea is a starter by trade, but nothing in his third inning of work indicated he was ready for a fourth. Manaea struck out Salvador Perez, then allowed singles to Tyler Tolbert and Nick Loftin, with a stolen base between them, for the walkoff run. 

Manaea had lost his velo by this point. He was 93-94 in his first inning of work and 91-92 at the start of the eighth. He reached back for a bit more when trying to finish the eighth, leaving it all on the mound in what he must have figured was his last inning. Sent back out for the ninth, he didn’t throw a single fastball at 92 mph or better. The Mets lost.

Mendoza has done this time and time again, and if anything, seems to be getting worse about it. It’s as if he’s single-handedly trying to change how starters are used, even if it costs the Mets runs, costs the Mets wins. If the Mets do make the playoffs, I am certain that they’ll eventually be eliminated when Mendoza leaves a tired starter in for too long.

The Mets, of course, never gave Mendoza that opportunity, closing the season 38-55, losing their final two games to a non-contending Marlins team and missing the playoffs on a tiebreaker.

This year, it was Mendoza’s lineup cards that gave me agita. From March 28:


All of this is run by a manager who, while seeming to be good at the interpersonal stuff, is bad in the dugout. One reason the Mets missed the playoffs a year ago was Carlos Mendoza’s very slow hook, which directly cost the team three wins. This year. Mendoza starts by burying his fourth-best hitter in the nine hole so Robert and Marcus Semien can make outs ahead of him. I wasn’t looking for more reasons to ding the Mets for keeping him -- they already took as large a projection hit as I’ll ever give a team for its manager -- but the Opening Day lineup bolstered my confidence that I pegged him well.

Finally, Mendoza made a clear tactical mistake that led to a loss on April 19.


[T]he Mets’ best chance of getting out of the inning was to intentionally walk Hoerner and try to strike out Busch. In the event Kimbrel walked Busch, that would bring up Alex Bregman. Bregman is also a good contact hitter, but not as good as Hoerner, and if he were batting, there would be a force available at every base, making some of his contact good for the Mets.

There won’t be two times a year I advocate for an intentional walk, but this is one of them. Mendoza needed to maximize the chance of a strikeout, and instead he minimized it. Hoerner flied out to right, PCA scored, and the Mets lost their 11th straight contest.

The sequence once again underlined Mendoza’s inability to make the right game-level choices. His lineups, his persistent slow hook, and his batter-to-batter decisions are all lacking. The Mets didn’t miss the playoffs last year, and they’re not 7-15 this year, just because Mendoza is a poor Xs and Os guy. But he isn’t helping. I thought the team would be better off letting him go after last season, and instead David Stearns jettisoned every longstanding player while retaining the manager. 

The timing of the today’s decision is odd. I thought Mendoza would be fired that same week in April that Alex Cora and Rob Thomson were, and he was not. Then it seemed David Stearns would ride out the season with Mendoza and do a full search for a long-term answer in the offseason. Stearns, who I don’t think is actually in danger of losing his job, would nevertheless reset the leadership and buy himself some time.

Firing Mendoza today is neither fish nor fowl. The Mets are probably too far buried, especially given their injury issues, to become relevant in any playoff race. They’re 15 games out in the NL East, 9 1/2 games removed from the last wild-card slot. They would have to play .580 ball from here on in just to get to .500, and that’s not going to be nearly enough. To get to 85 wins, they’re have to go 51-30, a .630 pace. There’s a version of this roster capable of doing that, with full health and performance. I’m not sure Mendoza nor Andy Green nor Casey McGraw Weaver can make it happen.

The Mets’ season isn’t over solely because of Carlos Mendoza. As Mike Petriello pointed out, this is a .500 team when Juan Soto plays, and a disaster when he doesn’t. Stearns’s terrible offseason has been a bigger factor than Mendoza’s poor decisions. Mendoza, though, was over his head. He’s a bad tactical manager, and the argument that he’s good at the interpersonal stuff becomes harder to make as the questions over the relationship between Soto and Francisco Lindor persist.

There will be pressure to follow Mendoza, a first-time manager, with one with more experience. Alex Cora’s name will come up a lot. (I’m low man on Cora, who is still living off 2018.) Other veteran managers under the age of 70 next summer include Bob Melvin, Joe Girardi, and Mike Shildt. Torey Lovullo’s contract is up at the end of the season, and while his strong relationship with GM Mike Hazen makes it likely he’d continue with the Diamondbacks, Steve Cohen can throw a lot of money at Lovullo to change that.

Since parting ways with Terry Collins after the 2017 season, the Mets have had four managers in 8 1/2 seasons. None has lasted longer than Mendoza’s 2 1/2. The team’s inability to settle on a dugout leader is one reason the Mets have been so disappointing over the last decade. Stearns got a lot of his personnel choices wrong last year; now he faces his biggest one. Stearns inherited Mendoza, and it is possible the next Mets manager will be the only one he gets to hire. (Ed. note: Stearns hired Mendoza. I got the order of events wrong. --JSS) He’ll have to get this choice right.


-
 
You can subscribe to the newsletter this week only for one year for 20% off, just $63.95 using your PayPal account or major credit card. (Zelle users, please email me for details.)